The TCE Blog
Trichloroethylene is everywhere. It causes cancer and other serious health problems. People deserve better protection.

HOME ABOUT ARCHIVES CONTACT

Monday, March 31, 2008

State admits Tallevast pollution study way off mark (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, March 31, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Last week's Sarasota Herald-Tribune (FL) reports:
During the last 20 years, Tallevast residents say dozens of their neighbors have died prematurely. Others are still fighting cancer and beryllium-related health issues.

But a draft Florida Department of Health report on the community blighted by more than 200 acres of polluted ground water found just four cases of cancer.

The report could hardly be more different from a survey by residents that showed about 90 cases of cancer or beryllium-related diseases in the mainly black community.

DOH officials who met with the neighborhood group FOCUS on Monday agreed that their numbers, based on a state database and figures from a local hospital, were wildly off the mark. They also admitted they had studied the wrong ZIP code.


Poisoned at Camp LeJeune, snookered by Uncle Sam
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, March 31, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Mike Partain is a breast cancer survivor. He was diagnosed years after his exposure to toxins at Camp Lejeune, NC. Tallahassee.com tells his story:
Poisoned at Camp LeJeune, snookered by Uncle Sam

Bill Berlow
Associate Editor

Mike Partain, son and grandson of Marine Corps veterans, grew up steeped in traditional American values — a rock-solid Reagan Republican whose life, even before birth, began among the few, the proud, at Camp LeJeune, N.C.

But for the past year, the 40-year-old Tallahassee insurance claims adjuster's faith in his government has been shaken to its core.

He'd always assumed that Uncle Sam, first and foremost, had the health and welfare of U.S. citizens at the top of his priority list — especially if they'd worn the uniform.

Now he's much less sure.

Partain's crisis of doubt began a year ago, when his wife gave him "a hug that changed my life." She found a lump, which turned out to be a cancerous tumor. A 14-inch surgical scar where Partain's right breast used to be is the physical evidence of his breast cancer.

Less obvious is the psychological scar — both as a cancer survivor still undergoing treatment and as one who feels his government betrayed a trust.


Monday, March 24, 2008

Lawsuit: TCE in home caused Ontario family's chronic illnesses (Can)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, March 24, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
This is hardly breaking news, but we're still catching up on things we missed. Since receiving this press release, we have also obtained a copy of the complaint or, as it's known in Canada, the statement of claim. The facts are just enraging (e.g. TCE levels in the air inside the Vitez's home were discovered above 200 ug/m3). We're still deciding how to make these available on the blog since they are lengthy. In the meantime, if you'd like a digital copy, feel free to contact us.

For now, here's the official press release:
Toxic air and contaminated groundwater blamed for chronic illnesses in multi-million dollar lawsuit

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – MARCH 14, 2008

CAMBRIDGE, ON – Northstar Aerospace, GE Canada and Rozell Inc., are amongst the Cambridge-based businesses named in a multi-million dollar environmental lawsuit. Spearheaded by Denis and Deborah Vitez, the suit points to these businesses as being responsible for groundwater contamination and toxic air in local residents’ homes, and in the case of the Vitez family, resulting in chronic breathing problems, Parkinson’s Syndrome and neurological damages which have escalated over the past five years. The suit claims that the companies were aware that toxic levels of the human carcinogens Trichloroethylene (TCE) and Chromium were seeping into the groundwater in the vicinity of their Bishop Street plants.

The Vitez family is seeking punitive and general damages, citing negligence, failure to disclose information, misconduct, and failure to comply with the Environmental Protection Act, among other claims against the defendants. TCE, a solvent used for degreasing metal parts, is considered a toxic substance and probable human carcinogen under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. Chromium is also classified by health organizations as a human carcinogen. Due to the companies’ failure to properly handle, store and dispose of the substances, the Vitez family has suffered through years of discomfort and pain, culminating in the diagnoses of asthma and severe sinus infection in Mrs. Vitez, and symptoms indicating Multiple Sclerosis and Parkinsonism – a group of nervous disorders with symptoms similar to Parkinson’s disease – in the case of Mr. Vitez.

Paul Mann, Counsel for the Vitez family, and one of Canada’s top litigators in health-related matters, explains, “These companies knew they were contaminating the water and air with toxic chemicals, failed to warn homeowners that levels were in excess of Ministry of Environment (MOE) standards, and failed to prevent further release of the chemicals after they first learned of the leakage and discharge. Denis and Deborah Vitez may never get their health back as a result and it is time for justice to be served.”

Update: Since many folks have arrived here looking for it, you can now download the Statement of Claim here .

Friday, March 21, 2008

NRDC and Dickson residents file TCE lawsuit over landfill (TN)
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, March 21, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
We learn this by way of the Environment News Service:
The Natural Resources Defense Council and two residents of Dickson, Tennessee have filed a lawsuit against the Dickson County and city governments. They allege that trichloroethylene, TCE, an industrial chemical disposed at the Dickson Landfill that has been linked to neurological and developmental harm and cancer, poses an imminent and substantial endangerment to human health and the environment.

Dickson, a town of some 12,000 people is located about 35 miles west of Nashville. [map]

The Dickson County Landfill, 74 acres off Eno Road, sits within 500 to 2,000 feet of approximately 40 homes, most owned by blacks. This community group is fighting to rid their area of contamination from the Dickson County landfill.

One African American family in particular, the Holts, a family of black landowners, has been especially harmed by the chemical. Many Holt family members are struggling with cancer and other illnesses, and two of its members are plaintiffs in this lawsuit.

The environmental group and Sheila Holt-Orsted and Beatrice Holt allege that TCE pollution has seeped beneath the landfill to underlying groundwater and has spread through a large area of Dickson County.

TCE contamination has rendered water from wells and springs as far as two to three miles from the landfill unfit for human consumption, the plaintiffs claim.

Polluted spring water is flowing directly into the West Piney River, a fishing stream and a major source of drinking water for the Water Authority of Dickson County. Several square miles of Dickson County have been recognized as an ‘imminent threat’ area by the county.

TCE contamination above drinking water limits, and orders of magnitude above U.S. Environmental Protection Agency screening levels for drinking water, has been found in at least one well even beyond that threat area.

In some areas, this TCE contamination may be growing worse, the plaintiffs claim, but the city and county have not done anything to remove the contamination.

"Some two decades after TCE was first detected in nearby drinking water sources, those responsible have not even fully characterized the present extent and likely future spread of the contamination. Defendants have, in effect, surrendered the ground and surface water of Dickson County to the slow spread of an invisible and toxic chemical," the complainants said in a statement.

The complaint asks the Court to require the defendants to investigate the present extent and future spread of TCE contamination from the landfill in the soil, surface water, and groundwater of Dickson County; to remediate and abate TCE contamination.

Holt-Orsted has undergone six surgeries and chemotherapy for breast cancer. The Holts originally filed lawsuits in 2003 and 2004, naming the city and county of Dickson and the state of Tennessee, and claiming the family was a victim of negligence that resulted in their cancers and other health problems.

Attorneys for the county and state deny the claims in the earlier lawsuits.

An article [entitled Deadly Tenessee Two-Step Pushes Leaky Landfill Away from Officials' Homes] by Robert Bullard, director of the Environmental Justice Resource Center at Clark Atlanta University in Atlanta, Georgia, gives background and detailed water test information.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

The Autoimmune Epidemic...and Trichloroethylene
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, March 19, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The following opinion piece by Donna Jackson Nakazawa originally appeared in the Washington Post as an article entitled "Diseases Like Mine Are a Growing Hazard" on Sunday, March 16, 2008.
Autoimmune diseases -- a group of about 100 conditions in which the body's immune system turns on the body itself -- are reaching epidemic proportions. In the past decade, 15 top medical journals have reported rising rates of lupus, multiple sclerosis, scleroderma, Crohn's disease, Addison's disease and polymyositis in industrialized countries around the world. Over the past 40 years, rates of Type 1 diabetes have increased fivefold; in children 4 and under, it's increasing 6 percent a year.

If I wanted to make a movie about my life, I'd pitch it to Hollywood as "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" meets "An Inconvenient Truth," the Academy Award-winning Al Gore documentary about global warming. Rising levels of autoimmune disease may well prove to be the next environmental disaster -- only in this case, the changes taking place degree by degree are in the interior landscapes of our bodies.

[...]

I've spent the past two years interviewing leading experts at top medical institutions nationwide to find out why cases of autoimmune disease are skyrocketing. In recent years, many allergists and immunologists have been attributing the rise to the "hygiene hypothesis" -- the theory that our germ-free homes and childhood vaccinations have eliminated challenges to our immune systems so that they don't learn how to defend us properly when we're young. The scientists I interviewed tended to discard the idea that this alone is responsible. They agreed almost to a person that our day-to-day exposure to environmental toxins -- through the air we breathe and the chemicals we absorb through our skin -- is a major trigger of autoimmune disease. "Exposures from our environment are a significant contributor to today's rising rates," says Douglas Kerr, director of the Johns Hopkins Transverse Myelitis Center and a top clinician at the Johns Hopkins Multiple Sclerosis Center.

In 2003, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sampled 2,500 people nationwide looking for the "body burden," or amount of chemicals and pollutants each individual carried. They found traces of all 116 chemicals and pollutants they tested for, including PCBs, insecticides, dioxin, mercury, cadmium and benzene, all highly toxic in higher doses. Then, in 2005, researchers from the Environmental Working Group found something more alarming: a cocktail of 287 pollutants -- pesticides, dioxins, flame retardants -- in the fetal-cord blood of 10 newborn infants from around the country. [Ed. Note: More on these can be found in the following PDF: National Learning and Developmental Disabilities Advocacy Groups Analyze Body Burden Studies]

Because most toxins are found in only trace amounts, it has been difficult to gauge what effect they might be having on our health. Yet studies of both lab animals and people provide disturbing insights into how even low exposures can cause our immune systems to go haywire. Mice exposed to pesticides at levels four times lower than the level the Environmental Protection Agency sets as acceptable for humans are more susceptible to getting lupus than control mice. Mice that absorb low doses of trichloroethylene -- a chemical used in dry cleaning, household paint thinners, glues and adhesives -- at levels the EPA deems safe and equal to what a factory worker might encounter today, quickly develop autoimmune hepatitis. And low doses of perfluorooctanoic acid, a breakdown chemical of Teflon found in 96 percent of humans tested for it, impair rats' development of a proper immune system.
Read the full Washington Post piece here.

Meanwhile, we should point out that permanent, quantitative immune system changes have been documented in workers (not just mice) exposed to low levels of TCE.

Friday, February 22, 2008

Vapor intrusion in Dayton from Behr Dayton Thermal Products plant (OH)
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, February 22, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Toxic TCE vapors are entering homes in Dayton. Though EPA is on the case, they've run into a few complications:
Efforts to make homes safe from contaminated groundwater fumes near the Behr Dayton Thermal Products plant, 1600 Webster St., have run into problems at as many as 10 homes.

And the effort to clean indoor air contamination at a nearby school is ongoing, authorities have said.

TCE fumes have migrated from the soil into the homes, businesses and schools, creating potentially hazardous vapors.

In homes that have dirt basement floors, those floors must be sealed for the air evacuation systems to work properly, said Mark Case, director of environmental health for Public Health Dayton & Montgomery County.
Levels of contamination in the problematic homes have reportedly dropped below 10 ppb. That's still 25 times the Ohio Department of Health's exposure limit of .4 ppb.

Read the full article in the Dayton Daily News.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Behr site proposed as Superfund site, Cancer incidence inquiry planned (OH)
  2. Vapor intrusion in Dayton from Behr Dayton Thermal Products plant (OH)

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

TCE-exposed fathers pass genetic damage to kids, grandkids
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, February 20, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
This news is not good:
ScienceDaily (Feb. 21, 2008) — The consequence of maternal exposure to a variety of potentially toxic agents during pregnancy remains the prime focus of concern in scientific endeavors and in society at large.

However, there is now mounting evidence that paternal exposure can also adversely affect fetal and postnatal development of offspring and that this imprint can be expressed in subsequent generations.

[...]

The reported impact on offspring outcome includes low birth weight; increase in childhood cancers; developmental, behavioral, endocrine abnormalities and cross-generational effects.
We already know that TCE-exposure, even at low levels, can cause permanent genetic damage. The notion that this damage is passed along by TCE-exposed fathers to subsequent generations has staggering public health implications for millions of Americans.

To be fair, we should mention this news came in the form of a symposium announcement rather than as a breaking investigative story. The symposium is being organized by Gladys Friedler, Ph.D., of Boston University School of Medicine and is entitled The Father and Fetus Revisited. You can read more about it here.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Prostate cancer at Rocketdyne linked to TCE exposure (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Tuesday, February 12, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
A UCLA study recently linked increased physical activity at work with a decreased chance of developing prostate cancer. In addition, it linked exposure to TCE (amongst a handful of other chemicals) with increased rates of prostate cancer. According to UCLA's Johnson Cancer Center:
Researchers studied more than 2,100 men who worked at the Rocketdyne facility in the San Fernando Valley, many of whom were exposed to radiation and chemicals that may have increased their risk for certain cancers. The research team identified 362 men who developed prostate cancer and compared them to 1,805 men of similar age and socioeconomic status who did not get prostate cancer.

The study, done in conjunction with researchers at the Olive View-UCLA Education and Research Institute and the University of Michigan, appears in the February issue of the journal Cancer Causes Control.

"The message from this study for today is that if you're more active, you may be able to prevent this cancer from happening," said Beate Ritz, a Jonsson Cancer Center researcher, an associate professor of epidemiology in the UCLA School of Public Health and the study's senior author. "If you have a desk job, do something physically active to counterbalance it."

[...]

The study found that the men who developed prostate cancer were less likely to hold the more physically active jobs. Those that got cancer also were more likely than the control group to be highly exposed to the chemicals that were evaluated, including hydrazine, benzene, mineral oil, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and trichloroethylene (TCE), which are known or suspected carcinogens.
Though the focus on physical activity appears to be the main thrust of this research, we think the TCE-related finding is worth highlighting.

Read the news about the study here. For the study itself ("Nested case–control study of occupational physical activity and prostate cancer among workers using a job exposure matrix"), see here.

Friday, February 8, 2008

Controversy over North Brunswick Township High School risk report (NJ)
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, February 8, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The ATSDR has delivered yet another report concluding that a contamination site poses "no apparent public health risk." Just toss it in the pile. Feel free to roll your eyes. (For those who don't know, ATSDR is notorious for producing these reports)
There is "no apparent public health risk" at the North Brunswick Township High School and its surrounding areas associated with the soil contamination found in 2003, according to a preliminary public health assessment.

Last Thursday, township officials and representatives from the New Jersey State Department of Health and Senior Services and the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry held a meeting to discuss the remediation project that resulted from the expansion of the high school in 2003. The primary concern for the school, Veterans Park, Judd Elementary School, a PSE&G easement and six nearby residences was arsenic in surface soil, lead in settled dust and tetrachloroethylene (TCE) [sic] in groundwater.

In July 2003, waste material consisting of pharmaceutical and laboratory wastes, glass vials, bottles and an unidentified dark brown material were uncovered near and within the Oval area of the high school, which is where the current auditorium sits. It is believed that the site was used as a municipal dump between the 1940s and 1960s. Approximately 9,200 cubic yards of waste materials and soil were excavated and removed, according to the report.

Since that time, officials said 54 soil samples and 18 interior surface samples were taken from the high school, and 10 interior surface samples were collected from Judd, with follow-up tests conducted. The high school perimeter and football field, as well as the neighboring park and residences at block 143, lots 94.01 and 95.01 were also examined.

Although remediation is still needed at Veterans Park and efforts will continue to oversee and limit any possible groundwater and vapor contamination, the report states that there are no cancer or noncancer health risks associated with the project.
We note that the story seems to confuse TCE and PCE. It is not clear which of these is the contaminant of concern referenced above. No matter which it is, residents were reportedly suspicious of the report's findings:
One parent claimed his son "lived in the dirt" for 18 years as an athlete and developed a brain tumor, although he is not positive there is a correlation. A student noted that the epidemiology report is only calculated through 2001, but statistics may have changed through 2008. Another person mentioned that the cancer rates should be evaluated specific to the area surrounding the high school and not broadened out to the general population, since any health effects will involve North Brunswick.

Also, residents are concerned that there could have been inhalation of chemicals since the investigation and remediation phase began, and that sites that have not been remediated, such as the high school perimeter, the overused football field and Judd school, could have contaminants in the soil that become disturbed and loosened as time goes on. One parent is concerned that no additional testing was done at Judd before the current expansion and renovation project began.
Read the full story in the North Brunswick Sentinel (NJ).

Update: Strangely, the report above fails to mention that ATSDR conducted a separate public health assessment re: exposure to Arsenic and TCE at 3 nearby residences in 2005 (yeah, we confirmed the contaminant is TCE and not PCE). They reported TCE contamination in groundwater at levels up to 140 ppb, TCE in indoor air in homes at levels of 12μg/m3, and arsenic dust that coated indoor air surfaces. They concluded that past exposure posed a public health hazard and, at the time, ongoing exposure posed an indeterminate public health hazard.

We suspect we're going to be hearing more on this story. As always, we'll try to keep you psted.

Thursday, February 7, 2008

2nd wave of IBM TCE lawsuits filed (NY)
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, February 7, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
According to the Press & Sun-Bulletin (NY):
A second wave of legal claims seeking damages from IBM Corp. related to pollution in Endicott has been filed in state Supreme Court in Binghamton, bringing the total to more than 240 plaintiffs, with more on the way.

The 82-page document representing 151 property owners and residents was filed electronically late Friday afternoon by Philip Johnson, an attorney with the Vestal law firm of Levene Gouldin & Thompson. Johnson is part of a team of seven law firms representing more than 1,000 clients in the massive toxic tort case against IBM seeking more than $100 million in damages for a range of hardships related to the pollution. They include cancer and other illnesses, property devaluation, loss of business, medical expenses and related monitoring, and hassles of dealing with the pollution.

The first wave of claims, representing 94 plaintiffs, was filed early last month.
Read the full story here.

Sunday, February 3, 2008

Workers' air not safe from TCE; Workplace standards 40 years old
by Neil Fischbein on Sunday, February 3, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
To better protect people from TCE , we must (amongst other things) eliminate the difference between the standard of protection for our workplaces and the standard of protection for our homes. The standard of protection for TCE in the air is an example where the difference between protection at work and home is intolerable.

For those who don't know, the safety of the air in your workplace is governed by standards set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The air in your home is governed by guidelines established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In too many cases, OSHA's standards for the workplace are drastically less protective than EPA's guidelines for homes.

Just how much more TCE does OSHA allow in workers' air? At least several hundred thousand times more than EPA allows in their homes.

The result? Workers are being poisoned...and OSHA is allowing it.

In a March 2007 paper entitled "Regulating Vapor Intrusion: What Standards Should Apply," the authors highlight this disparity in a handy table:

TCE Standards or Guidance Levels for Indoor Vapor Concentration

Regulatory or Standard Setting Body
Standard or Guidance Level (µg/m3)
Industrial Standards and Guidelines
OSHA PEL (8-hour time-weighted average)
537,000
OSHA Ceiling Exposure
1,075,000
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) (8-hour time-weighted average)
269,000
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Exposure Limit (REL) (10-hour time-weighted average)
134,000
Residential Guidelines
EPA 2002 Draft Vapor Intrusion Guidance Target Indoor Air Concentration (Table 2c) (using 10-6 risk level)
0.022
EPA 2002 Draft Vapor Intrusion Guidance Target Indoor Air Concentration (Table 2a) (using 10-4 risk level)
2.2

For those who don't know, the OSHA standard above was set based on 1967 standards and has remained the same to this day. With all we have learned about TCE's dangers since 1967 - including that it causes cancer and other significant diseases/health problems - workers remain as exposed and at as much risk of TCE-induced disease as workers of nearly 40 years ago.

Why is the air at work hundreds of thousands of times less safe than the air at home? How many people are poisoned by TCE at work to this day because of this disparity?

Of course, TCE is just one example of a chemical where workplace protection standards are outdated. Over at The Pump Handle, a blog that bills itself as a water cooler for the public health crowd, we learn that Beryllium is another example.

In a post entitled "Why do OSHA Standards Remain the Same, Even When the Science Changes?" David Michaels describes his look at outdated workplace exposure standards for Beryllium. Any of this sound familiar?
In a 1947 report, entitled Public Relations Problems in Connection with Occupational Diseases in the Beryllium Industry, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) asserted that the ability of the US government to produce nuclear weapons was threatened by the high incidence of severe health effects associated with exposure to beryllium, a metal vital to weapons production. In response, the AEC established a workplace exposure limit that dramatically reduced beryllium disease incidence. This limit is known as the “taxicab standard” since it was determined by two AEC scientists working in the back seat of a taxi on their way to a meeting.

Over the next several decades, however, increasingly powerful evidence accumulated that Chronic Beryllium Disease (CBD), a progressive and irreversible inflammatory lung disease, was associated with exposure to levels below the “taxicab standard,” and by the 1990s, scores of workers employed in the production of nuclear weapons had been diagnosed with CBD.

Attempting to prevent strengthened government regulation, and to avoid negative publicity that would discourage use of the metal, the beryllium industry waged a concerted effort over decades to counter the accumulating scientific evidence of beryllium’s toxicity. The industry relied on expert services provided by a major public relations company and a leading ‘product defense’ firm. Eventually, when the scientific evidence became so great that it was no longer credible to deny that workers developed CBD at levels permitted by an out-dated standard, the industry responded with a new rationale for delay: that more research was needed to determine the best standard.

The industry’s efforts have been, for the most part, successful. While each year brings new studies linking CBD with beryllium exposures below the current standard, the “taxicab standard” remains the limit enforced by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration in private sector workplaces. New CBD cases have been reported recently in metal recycling facilities. US civilian nuclear weapons workers have greater protection than private sector workers; in 1999 the Department of Energy issued strengthened beryllium regulations, reducing the workplace exposure level that triggers protective action by a factor of 10.

The lessons from this case study for public health policymakers include:
  • The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. The lack of CBD cases in the 1950s should not have been seen as proof the standard was adequate.

  • The interpretation of scientific data by those with financial incentives must be discounted. Industry scientists defended the “taxicab standard” long after it was correctly recognized as inadequate by independent scientists.

  • In particular, work by scientists employed by firms specializing in product defense and litigation support must be seen for what it is: advocacy, rather than science. This study illuminates the practice of “manufacturing uncertainty,” the strategy used by some polluters and manufacturers of hazardous products to prevent or delay regulation or victim compensation.

  • To best protect public health, we must consider the hazards associated with a toxic material through the entire life cycle of the product.

Saturday, February 2, 2008

APPROVED: Military to find, notify, and survey Camp Lejeune exposure victims (NC)
by Neil Fischbein on Saturday, February 2, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
President Bush recently signed the Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008. In doing so, he approved a provision requiring notification to marines, families, and employees who may have been exposed to contamination at the base. The language of the bill provides:

SEC. 315. NOTIFICATION OF CERTAIN RESIDENTS AND CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES AT CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA, OF EXPOSURE TO DRINKING WATER CONTAMINATION.

(a) Notification of Individuals Served by Tarawa Terrace Water Distribution System, Including Knox Trailer Park- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall make reasonable efforts to identify and notify directly individuals who were served by the Tarawa Terrace Water Distribution System, including Knox Trailer Park, at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, during the years 1958 through 1987 that they may have been exposed to drinking water contaminated with tetrachloroethylene (PCE).

(b) Notification of Individuals Served by Hadnot Point Water Distribution System- Not later than 1 year after the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) completes its water modeling study of the Hadnot Point water distribution system, the Secretary of the Navy shall make reasonable efforts to identify and notify directly individuals who were served by the system during the period identified in the study of the drinking water contamination to which they may have been exposed.

(c) Notification of Former Civilian Employees at Camp Lejeune- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall make reasonable efforts to identify and notify directly civilian employees who worked at Camp Lejeune during the period identified in the ATSDR drinking water study of the drinking water contamination to which they may have been exposed.

(d) Circulation of Health Survey-

(1) FINDINGS- Congress makes the following findings:

(A) Notification and survey efforts related to the drinking water contamination described in this section are necessary due to the potential negative health impacts of these contaminants.

(B) The Secretary of the Navy will not be able to identify or contact all former residents and former employees due to the condition, non-existence, or accessibility of records.

(C) It is the intent of Congress that the Secretary of the Navy contact as many former residents and former employees as quickly as possible.

(2) ATSDR HEALTH SURVEY-

(A) DEVELOPMENT-

(i) IN GENERAL- Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the ATSDR, in consultation with a well-qualified contractor selected by the ATSDR, shall develop a health survey that would voluntarily request of individuals described in subsections (a), (b), and (c) personal health information that may lead to scientifically useful health information associated with exposure to trichloroethylene (TCE), PCE, vinyl chloride, and the other contaminants identified in the ATSDR studies that may provide a basis for further reliable scientific studies of potentially adverse health impacts of exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.

(ii) FUNDING- The Secretary of the Navy is authorized to provide from available funds the necessary funding for the ATSDR to develop the health survey.

(B) INCLUSION WITH NOTIFICATION- The survey developed under subparagraph (A) shall be distributed by the Secretary of the Navy concurrently with the direct notification required under subsections (a), (b), and (c).

(e) Use of Media To Supplement Notification- The Secretary of the Navy may use media notification as a supplement to direct notification of individuals described under subsections (a), (b), and (c). Media notification may reach those individuals not identifiable via remaining records. Once individuals respond to media notifications, the Secretary will add them to the contact list to be included in future information updates.

 

Congratulations to all of those who helped make this happen.

Thursday, January 31, 2008

McCullom Lake cancer lawsuits multimedia presentation (IL)
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, January 31, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The Northwest Herald (IL) has created an outstanding multimedia presentation that tells the story of the McCullom Lake cancer lawsuits. And boy, what a way to tell the story!

They include video interviews with plaintiffs and with attorneys for both sides, map of the contamination area, documents associated with the lawsuit (including an important expert report from Redpath's Dr. Sidney Finkelstein that we will highlight at another time) and more.

For those interested in McCullom Lake, the causal connection between brain cancers and TCE/vinyl chloride/chlorinated solvent exposure, and legal actions for personal injuries caused by chlorinated ethylenes, we highly recommend you check it out.

Warning: The title of the presentation is "Coincidence or Cluster?" We believe this is a poorly-chosen title and it does not properly reflect the main issue in these suits. The main issue, as we understand it, is whether or not the defendants' chemicals caused the individual plaintiffs' cancers. Whether McCullom Lake's cancers can be considered a cancer cluster is a red herring. So please ignore the overly simplistic title, but do check out the presentation.

Monday, January 28, 2008

Modine settles in McCullom Lake cancer lawsuits (IL)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, January 28, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The Northwest Herald (McHenry County, IL) reports:
Modine Manufacturing tentatively has settled out of court in the McCullom Lake brain-cancer cases, agreeing to pay an undisclosed sum to the 22 plaintiffs and $2 million to settle a class-action lawsuit.

If approved by a U.S. District Court judge, the settlement announced Friday would end Modine’s financial liability in the lawsuits, which tied pollution from its Ringwood manufacturing plant to brain-, nerve- and pituitary-cancer victims. That would leave Rohm and Haas, which operates a plant just north of Modine’s, and subsidiary Morton International as the only remaining defendants.

Modine does not, in any way, admit liability with the settlement, said James Rulseh, vice president of the company’s American operations. The lawsuits alleged that Modine contaminated groundwater and air with trichloroethylene, a chemical used as an industrial-strength degreaser, which in turn broke down into carcinogenic vinyl chloride.

[...]

The class-action lawsuit and the first three individual lawsuits were filed in April 2006. Three former McCullom Lake next-door neighbors, about a mile to the south of the factories, were diagnosed with brain cancer within eight months of one another.

Of the $2 million class-action settlement, Modine will pay $1.4 million toward a medical monitoring program to reimburse current or former village residents who want an MRI. Another $100,000 will establish a fund to reimburse property owners seeking property value relief, and the remaining $500,000 will pay for court-approved attorney’s fees and settlement costs.

Payments to the 22 individual plaintiffs will remain confidential under the settlement, attorney Aaron Freiwald said. The damage cases were filed in state court in Philadelphia, home to Freiwald’s law office and Rohm and Haas’ world headquarters.

Of the plaintiffs, 18 have brain or nerve cancer, three have pituitary cancer, and one has cirrhosis of the liver of unknown origin. Eight of the plaintiffs have died, all but one from glioblastoma multiforme, a deadly brain cancer that occurs in just more than 3 people per 100,000.

[...]

Freiwald said Friday that the settlement allowed him to focus all of his scrutiny on Rohm and Haas, which he said by far was the major contributor to contamination. The factory, owned at the time by Morton, dumped wastes into an 8-acre landfill/lagoon between 1960 and 1977. Rohm and Haas assumed control of the factory in 2005, six years after acquiring Morton for $5 billion.

[...]

The medical-monitoring class includes anyone who lived in village limits for at least one cumulative year between Jan. 1, 1968, and Dec. 31, 2002. The property damage class includes anyone who owned property in the village between April 25, 2006 – the date the class-action lawsuit was filed – and Jan. 18, 2008.
Read the full story here.

Friday, January 18, 2008

Water company comes clean; Apologizes for failure to warn of TCE (AZ)
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, January 18, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The East Valley Tribune (AZ) has just called bullsh*t on American Arizona Water company for suggesting that all customers had been warned about its recent TCE leak. In response to customer complaints about their failure to notify and their failure to be truthful about it, AAW's spokesperson fessed up:
Todd Walker, Arizona American spokesman, acknowledged the company’s reverse 911 notification system, which sends automated alert messages to customers, only reaches about 65 percent of those households.

“We apologize that we were unable to reach every single customer individually,” Walker said. “We recognized that it was an imperfect system going into it. No system is able to contact 100 percent of the people 100 percent of the time.”
Read the full story.

Contrary to reports, Arizona American Water fails to notify customers about TCE (AZ)
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, January 18, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Over the past few days, news reports coming out of Scottsdale and Paradise Valley have suggested that all Arizona American Water customers were notified of the failure that caused elevated levels of TCE to pour through their taps.

According to EPA (emphasis added),
AZ American Water and the PCs went into response mode and notified all customers who would have gotten that water;
According to news reports (emphasis added):
Private water utility Arizona American Water Co. advised its nearly 5,000 customers in Scottsdale and Paradise Valley Wednesday to drink bottled water after discovering a malfunction that may have allowed a suspected cancer-causing chemical into their tap water.
The TCE Blog has learned that these statements simply are not true. As we have learned from residents, many were not notified by the water company. Two examples of the comments and emails we have received follow below:
I am a customer of AZ-american water, and I was not informed of the risk today. I have lived in the same house since 1986, and have had the same phone number, so I question whether everyone was informed. I did not learn about it until the 10 o'clock news.
Please update your blog so that it accurately reflects that AW did NOT notify "all consumers through its automated-feature call" as they told the media. In fact, Kiva Elementary School and all the residents [we] have spoken with in our neighborhood...did not learn about the TCE contaminated water supply from American Water, but from our local evening news. Many of our neighbors were still unaware of the situation the next day until we informed them. Moreover, there are likely many elderly individuals who to this day are not aware that they should not be consuming the TCE-contaminated water.

American Water has been far less than candid with its consumers and the public. This company has a poor track record when it comes to accurately reporting TCE contamination. Please don't give AW credit for notifying customers when in fact it did not.
Meantime, a number of folks have written to us asking about the safety of using TCE-contaminated water for bathing or washing clothes (or other uses not explicitly warned against by the water company). Since TCE can be absorbed through the skin and since TCE can vaporize and get into the air people breathe, the TCE Blog recommends against any use of water that is contaminated above the federal MCL (5ppb). Sadly, it's no surprise to us that locals aren't hearing this from the water company...

As always, we'll try to keep you posted as more develops.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Reader Question: Telephone repair and TCE exposure?
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, January 10, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Recently we received the following email/question from a blog reader:
Have there been any reports about workers exposed to TCE and B cell Lymphoma in the Teleco work group?

My job was DCO Repairman - Dial Central Office Repairman - but we used TCE almost every day to clean the electronic and moving parts. So much was used our hands were white from lack of oil, and our shirts always were wet right above the belt line.
Yes, there have been reports of TCE exposure and related disease among telecommunications workers. Amongst others, workers from Lake Mary, FL were exposed to TCE through work at Stromberg-Carlson/Siemens and have experienced health problems (including cancers) as a result. Their website can be found at http://www.exposed2tce.com.

If other readers are looking for information or have a question you'd like answered, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Saturday, June 23, 2007

Update: Are Tomstown residents getting the full story? (PA)
by Neil Fischbein on Saturday, June 23, 2007 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Upon further review of this announcement in the PA Bulletin from several months ago, 2 things struck us. First, more from the bulletin (emphasis is ours):
Bottled Water: This alternative provides for the Department to furnish commercial bottled water to the impacted residences. Bottled water would be delivered regularly to each residence that has a water supply contaminated in excess of the Maximim Contaminant Level (MCL) of 5 ppb for TCE. This would effectively remove the risk posed by ingestion, but would not remove the risk posed by inhalation and dermal contact.

Point-Of-Entry Water Treatment Units: This alternative provides for the Department to install carbon treatment systems on the supply line of private wells that are contaminated. The carbon treatment systems would effectively remove the risk posed by ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact. [TCE Blog note: Not entirely true, see below]
Here's what struck us:

First, PA DEP acknowledges that the policy of providing bottled water to TCE-exposed residences is not designed to protect people from the risks of direct skin contact with the TCE-contaminated water nor from inhaling toxic TCE vapors. Even if families are being told that non-drinking use of the poisonous water is "harmless" (as told to us by a resident), it appears PA DEP knows better. Why they wouldn't expressly discourage such use and warn residents of the practical dangers remains a mystery to us.

Second, DEP claims that carbon filters placed on private water supply lines will protect residents from inhaling toxic TCE vapors ("...would effectively remove the risk posed by ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact".) This is an unfortunate overstatement that ignores the well-established risks of vapor intrusion.

While it may be true that carbon filters will reduce the level of TCE coming into each filtered home from the water supply itself, this does nothing to stop toxic vapors from entering homes as they evaporate directly from the giant TCE plume below. No matter how many carbon filters DEP installs or bottles of water it provides, every family residing above or near the plume remains at risk of breathing toxic TCE vapors today. This risk has quietly persisted for as long as the TCE plume has plagued this community.

We hope the residents have been getting the full story from DEP. Right now, that is far from clear.

Friday, June 22, 2007

State DEP allowing Tomstown families to be poisoned by TCE? (PA)
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, June 22, 2007 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Why is Pennsylvania DEP allowing families in TCE-polluted Tomstown, PA to regularly bathe in and wash with TCE polluted water coming out of the tap between 6ppb-24ppb?

This decision was quietly made public in The Pennsylvania Bulletin on February 10, 2007:
Bottled Water, was initiated on January 1, 2007, for residences with water supply contamination levels greater than 5 ppb of TCE but less than 25 ppb.

Point-of-Entry Water Treatment Systems will be provided for residences that have TCE levels greater than 25 ppb TCE in their water supply. The Department has determined by risk analysis that this level presents an unacceptable inhalation threat in addition to the ingestion threat.
So...DEP is providing bottled water to families in Tomstown whose tap water is contaminated above the federal MCL (5ppb), but has no plans to filter the water unless it tests higher than 24ppb.

This means that families who have up to 24ppb coming from their taps are left with a poisoned water supply in their homes, to bathe in, to wash with, to flush, and to inhale. To date, we have found no evidence that these families have been warned of the dangers of such uses.

On the contrary, we've been advised by a contact in Tomstown that not only are the DEP-provided bottles of water designated by DEP for drinking and cooking only, but reportedly DEP has called any other use of the contaminated tap water "harmless." We hope this report is based on a misunderstanding, but we're still awaiting DEP's reply to our email requesting clarification of their policy here.

In response to our first email, a DEP spokesperson was kind enough to let us know they are indeed on the case:
The articles that you have posted on your blog are accurate. The state is investigating groundwater contamination and the state is supplying bottled water or installing carbon filtration on wells. A vapor intrusion study will be done when the contamination plume has been identified.
As we suspected, it appears no vapor intrusion investigation has been initiated. We're also informed by locals that there has been no warning to residents about the dangers of breathing toxic indoor air.

Meantime, we've been advised that the federal MCL for TCE (5ppb) applies to drinking water in a strict, literal sense, therefore allowing families to bathe in higher concentrations of TCE may not be illegal.

Still, it seems awfully dangerous for PA DEP to continue to allow these ongoing exposures above the MCL without clearly warning the families of the consequences.

Given that there's no telling for how many years these families have been bathing, washing, flushing, and inhaling vapors from the contaminated water - not to mention drinking and cooking with it - prior to DEP's discovery of it in 2006, this is all pretty scary stuff from where we sit.

As we learn more, we'll keep you posted.

Monday, June 18, 2007

Why not study the company-wide TCE exposures at View-Master? (OR)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, June 18, 2007 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Anybody with an interest in documenting the connection between TCE and disease should know that important lessons may lie with View-Master, where a single contaminant - TCE - poisoned a single, private water supply and exposed an entire company to TCE as a result. So why won't the federal government prioritize a thorough study of the View-Master workers?

The following piece was published in The Oregonian on Thursday, June 14th and authored by Tom Griffith, professor emeritus of physics at Pacific University and secretary of the View-Master Citizens Advisory Group. We're reprinting this in full with Tom's permission:
The exposure that needs more exposure
Thursday, June 14, 2007

In 1998, high levels of the organic solvent trichloroethylene -- known as TCE -- were discovered in the drinking water of the View-Master plant in Beaverton. The levels were 300 times the maximum established as safe at that time by the Environmental Protection Agency. It's estimated that as many as 25,000 workers were exposed, some of them to high levels of TCE for 30 years or more.

TCE is a probable carcinogen and is known to produce health effects besides cancer with high enough exposures. It was a commonly used degreaser and dry-cleaning fluid from 1950 to 1980, and there are more than 3,000 sites around the country where it is present in groundwater. But very few of these sites have produced levels of exposure anywhere near those at View-Master.

Since discovery of the contamination, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality has implemented a remediation plan for cleaning up the groundwater beneath the site. This cleanup is ongoing and will take at least 20 more years to complete.

The Oregon State Public Health Division completed a limited mortality study of the site in 2004, designed to determine whether a more thorough study was called for, and it more than met that goal. It showed death rates for kidney cancer in women workers at the plant were roughly six times higher than the rates for other Oregon residents of similar age. It also found high rates for a few other cancers.

Since then, however, efforts to conduct a more thorough study have been stymied by a lack of money. It's been almost 10 years since the initial discovery of the TCE contamination, and nothing definitive has been done.

In the meantime, former View-Master workers are left in a fog regarding what health problems they might face and what they should do about it. Some of these workers clearly face an increased risk of cancer and other ill effects. The number potentially harmed is large. Some have already died.

The irony is that the View-Master workers represent an ideal population to gain better knowledge of the effects of exposure to TCE, a national problem. These workers were exposed at high levels to essentially a single contaminant over a long period of time. And their numbers are large enough to provide reliable statistics. In other words, studying them has a high probability of producing definitive results that will be useful in assessing the effects of TCE exposure at other sites.

So why has such a study not been funded? It's a complicated story, but the problem lies, at least in part, with bureaucratic buck-passing among the federal agencies that could provide the money to pursue it. No one in the vast alphabet soup of federal agencies seems to have a clear mission to fund epidemiology research of this nature.

But the state of Oregon is not blameless either. The Public Health Division has no direct funds allocated for such research. The state scientists in the epidemiology department must find external money through grants to get anything accomplished.

Those charged with protecting our health and safety need to step up and see that the appropriate scientific work is done at View-Master. Otherwise, the funds already spent will have been wasted and the former View-Master workers will be left with no good information. Just as importantly, our nation will have missed an opportunity to learn something definitive about a national concern.

So who will step up as the buck passes along? The View-Master workers aren't getting any younger.
Next time a politician or federal representative (EPA, ATSDR, NIOSH, etc) tells you that they would like nothing better than to study the link between TCE and disease (but laments that it is oh so hard to find a good study population), make sure to ask them why they refuse to study View-Master.

Sunday, June 10, 2007

Paper: Trichloroethylene and skin disorders
by Neil Fischbein on Sunday, June 10, 2007 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The following paper was published back in April:
Occupational trichloroethylene exposure as a cause of idiosyncratic generalized skin disorders and accompanying hepatitis similar to drug hypersensitivities [View abstract or purchase]

Authors: Kamijima, Michihiro1; Hisanaga, Naomi; Wang, Hailan; Nakajima, Tamie
Source: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, Volume 80, Number 5, April 2007 , pp. 357-370(14)
Publisher: Springer
After reading the abstract and the paper, we decided a layman's summary was warranted. Here's our attempt:

Researchers reviewed cases of severe generalized skin disorders and accompanying hepatitis in workers exposed to trichloroethylene (TCE). They attempted to compare TCE-induced skin disorders to similar disorders caused by hypersensitivity to medications.

Not only was the frequency of skin disorders in TCE-exposed workers greater than the occurrence of such disorders caused by medicine-hypersensitivity, the TCE-induced skin disorders were accompanied by a higher rate of fever, hepatitis, and lymphadenopathy (swelling of the lymph nodes). [Note: For several reasons, the incidence rate/frequency surveyed does not seem to offer much predictive power.]

Patients suffering from TCE-related generalized skin disorders typically show rash on the extremities, face, neck or trunk with/without fever 2 weeks to 2 months after commencement of occupational TCE exposure. Some experienced recurrences after going back to their worksites. These findings indicate a clear temporal relationship between TCE exposure and the disorder occurrence.

TCE-induced skin disorders found in the review include:
  • Exfoliative Dermatitis (widespread scaling of the skin, often with itching (pruritus), skin redness (erythroderma), and hair loss.)
  • Erythema Multiforme (multiple skin lesions; can be accompanied by itching, fever, and general ill-feeling)
  • Stevens-Johnson syndrome (a much more severe condition than erythema multiforme. SJS typically involves multiple areas of the body and extensive lesion formation. The lesions can extend to the mucous membranes, thus affecting the lungs, eyes, mouth, stomach, intestines and virtually every major organ.)
  • Epidermolysis Bullosa (a group of blistering skin conditions. The skin is so fragile in people with EB that even minor rubbing may cause blistering. At times, the person with EB may not be aware of rubbing or injuring the skin even though blisters develop. In severe EB, blisters are not confined to the outer skin. They may develop inside the body, in such places as the linings of the mouth, esophagus, stomach, intestines, upper airway, bladder, and the genitals.)
Also:

The reported patients were engaged mostly in degreasing, i.e. cleaning metal-made products or machines, plastic toys, electronics parts (e.g. printed circuit boards, transistor components, capacitors, or computer displays), socks, ink stains in a printing shop , or unspecied material.

Skin contact with liquid TCE is not essential for the onset of the disorders (i.e. TCE vapors can cause them)

These TCE-related hypersensitivities are totally different from typical solvent toxic effects in terms of unclear dose–response relationship, period of exposure before disease onset, generalized rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, and recurrence just after minimal re-exposure

Occurrences of the disorders have been reported from the USA, Japan, Spain, Singapore, China, Korea, Thailand, and the Philippines. The case reports from industrialized countries were mostly published up to 1990, whereas cases from Asian industrializing countries appeared thereafter.

--

For a copy of the full paper for research purposes, please feel free to contact us.

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

PA to EPA: "F your narrow tube exemption!"
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, May 16, 2007 [Permalink] [0