The TCE Blog
Trichloroethylene is everywhere. It causes cancer and other serious health problems. People deserve better protection.

HOME ABOUT ARCHIVES CONTACT

Monday, March 24, 2008

Lawsuit: TCE in home caused Ontario family's chronic illnesses (Can)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, March 24, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
This is hardly breaking news, but we're still catching up on things we missed. Since receiving this press release, we have also obtained a copy of the complaint or, as it's known in Canada, the statement of claim. The facts are just enraging (e.g. TCE levels in the air inside the Vitez's home were discovered above 200 ug/m3). We're still deciding how to make these available on the blog since they are lengthy. In the meantime, if you'd like a digital copy, feel free to contact us.

For now, here's the official press release:
Toxic air and contaminated groundwater blamed for chronic illnesses in multi-million dollar lawsuit

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – MARCH 14, 2008

CAMBRIDGE, ON – Northstar Aerospace, GE Canada and Rozell Inc., are amongst the Cambridge-based businesses named in a multi-million dollar environmental lawsuit. Spearheaded by Denis and Deborah Vitez, the suit points to these businesses as being responsible for groundwater contamination and toxic air in local residents’ homes, and in the case of the Vitez family, resulting in chronic breathing problems, Parkinson’s Syndrome and neurological damages which have escalated over the past five years. The suit claims that the companies were aware that toxic levels of the human carcinogens Trichloroethylene (TCE) and Chromium were seeping into the groundwater in the vicinity of their Bishop Street plants.

The Vitez family is seeking punitive and general damages, citing negligence, failure to disclose information, misconduct, and failure to comply with the Environmental Protection Act, among other claims against the defendants. TCE, a solvent used for degreasing metal parts, is considered a toxic substance and probable human carcinogen under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. Chromium is also classified by health organizations as a human carcinogen. Due to the companies’ failure to properly handle, store and dispose of the substances, the Vitez family has suffered through years of discomfort and pain, culminating in the diagnoses of asthma and severe sinus infection in Mrs. Vitez, and symptoms indicating Multiple Sclerosis and Parkinsonism – a group of nervous disorders with symptoms similar to Parkinson’s disease – in the case of Mr. Vitez.

Paul Mann, Counsel for the Vitez family, and one of Canada’s top litigators in health-related matters, explains, “These companies knew they were contaminating the water and air with toxic chemicals, failed to warn homeowners that levels were in excess of Ministry of Environment (MOE) standards, and failed to prevent further release of the chemicals after they first learned of the leakage and discharge. Denis and Deborah Vitez may never get their health back as a result and it is time for justice to be served.”

Update: Since many folks have arrived here looking for it, you can now download the Statement of Claim here .

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

The Autoimmune Epidemic...and Trichloroethylene
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, March 19, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The following opinion piece by Donna Jackson Nakazawa originally appeared in the Washington Post as an article entitled "Diseases Like Mine Are a Growing Hazard" on Sunday, March 16, 2008.
Autoimmune diseases -- a group of about 100 conditions in which the body's immune system turns on the body itself -- are reaching epidemic proportions. In the past decade, 15 top medical journals have reported rising rates of lupus, multiple sclerosis, scleroderma, Crohn's disease, Addison's disease and polymyositis in industrialized countries around the world. Over the past 40 years, rates of Type 1 diabetes have increased fivefold; in children 4 and under, it's increasing 6 percent a year.

If I wanted to make a movie about my life, I'd pitch it to Hollywood as "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" meets "An Inconvenient Truth," the Academy Award-winning Al Gore documentary about global warming. Rising levels of autoimmune disease may well prove to be the next environmental disaster -- only in this case, the changes taking place degree by degree are in the interior landscapes of our bodies.

[...]

I've spent the past two years interviewing leading experts at top medical institutions nationwide to find out why cases of autoimmune disease are skyrocketing. In recent years, many allergists and immunologists have been attributing the rise to the "hygiene hypothesis" -- the theory that our germ-free homes and childhood vaccinations have eliminated challenges to our immune systems so that they don't learn how to defend us properly when we're young. The scientists I interviewed tended to discard the idea that this alone is responsible. They agreed almost to a person that our day-to-day exposure to environmental toxins -- through the air we breathe and the chemicals we absorb through our skin -- is a major trigger of autoimmune disease. "Exposures from our environment are a significant contributor to today's rising rates," says Douglas Kerr, director of the Johns Hopkins Transverse Myelitis Center and a top clinician at the Johns Hopkins Multiple Sclerosis Center.

In 2003, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sampled 2,500 people nationwide looking for the "body burden," or amount of chemicals and pollutants each individual carried. They found traces of all 116 chemicals and pollutants they tested for, including PCBs, insecticides, dioxin, mercury, cadmium and benzene, all highly toxic in higher doses. Then, in 2005, researchers from the Environmental Working Group found something more alarming: a cocktail of 287 pollutants -- pesticides, dioxins, flame retardants -- in the fetal-cord blood of 10 newborn infants from around the country. [Ed. Note: More on these can be found in the following PDF: National Learning and Developmental Disabilities Advocacy Groups Analyze Body Burden Studies]

Because most toxins are found in only trace amounts, it has been difficult to gauge what effect they might be having on our health. Yet studies of both lab animals and people provide disturbing insights into how even low exposures can cause our immune systems to go haywire. Mice exposed to pesticides at levels four times lower than the level the Environmental Protection Agency sets as acceptable for humans are more susceptible to getting lupus than control mice. Mice that absorb low doses of trichloroethylene -- a chemical used in dry cleaning, household paint thinners, glues and adhesives -- at levels the EPA deems safe and equal to what a factory worker might encounter today, quickly develop autoimmune hepatitis. And low doses of perfluorooctanoic acid, a breakdown chemical of Teflon found in 96 percent of humans tested for it, impair rats' development of a proper immune system.
Read the full Washington Post piece here.

Meanwhile, we should point out that permanent, quantitative immune system changes have been documented in workers (not just mice) exposed to low levels of TCE.

Saturday, February 19, 2005

ATSDR's ToxFAQs for TCE
by NTF on Saturday, February 19, 2005 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Direct link here. Also added as permanent link in the right column under Science/Agency sites (------>)

Update:

ATSDR's full Toxicological profile of TCE (1997) is here.

Friday, February 18, 2005

National Exposure Registry documents health effects from TCE exposure
by NTF on Friday, February 18, 2005 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Since approximately 1993, the ATSDR has been tracking the health effects reported by discreet communities exposed to Trichloroethylene. Their National Exposure Registry (NER) basically tracks this kind of data for well-identified communities who have been exposed to it (there are myriad qualification requirements, I'm simplifying here).

The NER for TCE has some interesting data and discussion. It raises questions about elevated cancer findings among the TCE-exposed population. Unfortunately, the detailed comparison of cancer types by age/sex for the exposed population vs. the general population never actually appears in the reports (despite references to appendices with this data in 3 separate reporting years: 1994, 1996, and 1999). Maybe I just can't find it. To be sure, in May of 2004, I wrote the ATSDR to request the missing data/appendices. I received this response:
Mr. Fischbein:

The TCE Subregistry cancer outcomes analyses are slated to be released under a separate study. The results are not publically available at this time. Please do keep tabs on our publications for future releases.
I confess, I'm not sure what to make of this. If anybody has any thoughts, please let me know or feel free to use the comments feature below.

To read earlier posts in this category (if there are any), please see our archives below: