The TCE Blog
Trichloroethylene is everywhere. It causes cancer and other serious health problems. People deserve better protection.

HOME ABOUT ARCHIVES CONTACT

Monday, March 31, 2008

Bill Smith, male breast cancer survivor, Camp Lejeune (FL, NC)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, March 31, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Like Mike Partain, Bill Smith is a male breast cancer survivor who was exposed to toxins at Camp Lejeune, NC. Bill was kind enough to share his story with us:
After graduating from Florida State University with a journalism degree, William J. P. Smith, Jr. served in the USMC from 1956 until 1959, stationed at Camp Lejeune, NC, the majority of the time with the Globe as sports editor and acting editor of the largest Corps newspaper at the time. While there, he married, residing at the trailer park on the base and later in Midway Park, while fathering two girls.

In 1994, Bill was diagnosed with breast cancer, and had a radical modified mastectomy with 30 lymph nodes removed from his left side. He was treated with Tamoxifin for five years, and has had no reoccurance. It should be noted that there was no history of any kind of cancer in the Smith family. His former wife and two girls have had no symptoms of the disease.

On behalf of women, Bill has been a fund raiser and is the subject of two books, Living with Breast Cancer, the Story of 39 Women and One Man by Perry Colemore and Lisa Adelsberger, and Messages from Somewhere, Inspiring Stories of Life After 60 by Harriet May Savitz. He has also written an autobiographical screenplay on his experience. The irony of all of this is that Bill was part of the team at Xerox Corporation that introduced xeroradiography for the early detection of breast cancer in 1969 at Hutzel Hospital in Detroit. Every once in a while, he takes the press kit from his library shelf and shares it with his students, who find it hard to believe that men can contract the horrific disease.

Today, Bill resides in Tallahassee, FL with his wife Kathy, teaches at FSU and runs an integrated marketing communications consultancy, Huckleberry Finn Tomorrow.
There are now at least 4 men known to have developed breast cancer after exposure to toxins at Camp Lejeune. With fewer than 2,000 new cases of male breast cancer diagnosed each year, we wonder:
  • What are the odds of finding 4 cases of male breast cancer from the same contaminated military base?
  • How many other military men have developed breast cancer?
As we learn more, we'll keep you posted.

State admits Tallevast pollution study way off mark (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, March 31, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Last week's Sarasota Herald-Tribune (FL) reports:
During the last 20 years, Tallevast residents say dozens of their neighbors have died prematurely. Others are still fighting cancer and beryllium-related health issues.

But a draft Florida Department of Health report on the community blighted by more than 200 acres of polluted ground water found just four cases of cancer.

The report could hardly be more different from a survey by residents that showed about 90 cases of cancer or beryllium-related diseases in the mainly black community.

DOH officials who met with the neighborhood group FOCUS on Monday agreed that their numbers, based on a state database and figures from a local hospital, were wildly off the mark. They also admitted they had studied the wrong ZIP code.


Poisoned at Camp LeJeune, snookered by Uncle Sam
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, March 31, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Mike Partain is a breast cancer survivor. He was diagnosed years after his exposure to toxins at Camp Lejeune, NC. Tallahassee.com tells his story:
Poisoned at Camp LeJeune, snookered by Uncle Sam

Bill Berlow
Associate Editor

Mike Partain, son and grandson of Marine Corps veterans, grew up steeped in traditional American values — a rock-solid Reagan Republican whose life, even before birth, began among the few, the proud, at Camp LeJeune, N.C.

But for the past year, the 40-year-old Tallahassee insurance claims adjuster's faith in his government has been shaken to its core.

He'd always assumed that Uncle Sam, first and foremost, had the health and welfare of U.S. citizens at the top of his priority list — especially if they'd worn the uniform.

Now he's much less sure.

Partain's crisis of doubt began a year ago, when his wife gave him "a hug that changed my life." She found a lump, which turned out to be a cancerous tumor. A 14-inch surgical scar where Partain's right breast used to be is the physical evidence of his breast cancer.

Less obvious is the psychological scar — both as a cancer survivor still undergoing treatment and as one who feels his government betrayed a trust.


Friday, March 21, 2008

Behr site proposed as Superfund site, Cancer incidence inquiry planned (OH)
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, March 21, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Recently, the Dayton Daily News (OH) reported the Behr Dayton Thermal Products Plant has been proposed to EPA's National Priority List (NPL) for clean-up:
Groundwater contamination in the vicinity of the Behr Dayton Thermal Products Plant is severe enough to merit putting it on the National Priority List of the U.S. EPA's Superfund program, federal officials said.

The list represents the highest level of urgency for cleanups in the nation.

If the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approves later this year, an effort to cleanup groundwater at the site would rank among five others in Montgomery County on the National Priority List.

There are 22 active Superfund sites in the county where work is being planned or is under way.

Priority sites are considered the worst in the nation in terms of hazard and are eligible for cleanup using Superfund Trust money. The Behr project is still in the investigational stages, which typically can take two years and cost millions, officials said.

So far, the contamination has led to the closure of McGuffey Elementary School, 1032 Webster St., and the installation of air evacuation systems in 100 homes affected by indoor air fumes from the groundwater, which is tainted with the degreaser trichloroethylene — TCE — and other organic chemicals.

It's unknown when the school will reopen. A handful of homes that have dirt basements still have indoor air contamination slightly above strict exposure levels. In the Superfund program, those responsible for the contamination fund the cleanup.

According to documents obtained by the Dayton Daily News, federal investigators believe four industrial businesses could share responsibility: Gem City Chemicals Inc., Aramark Uniform Services, Chrysler, and Behr Dayton Thermal Products.

Aramark didn't return a call for comment. Gem City declined comment.
In a follow-up article, the Daily News also reports that a survey of local cancer incidence is planned:
Public Health Dayton & Montgomery County is launching a cancer incidence survey among residents near the Behr Dayton Thermal Products plant, where groundwater pollution has prompted regulatory action to address indoor air quality.

Mark Case, director of environmental health for the agency, said Monday, March 10, that the survey could take up to a year and is being conducted with the Ohio Department of Health.

The survey will examine medical records and compare cancer levels in the neighborhood with overall cancer levels in the county, state and nation, he said. "By comparison, you get a sense whether something is out of line or not," Case said.

The Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System will be tapped for data, he noted. All diagnosed cancer cases in Ohio are supposed to be reported to the system. The area will include the census tract of the Behr plant and residential neighborhoods where 100 or so indoor air vapor abatement systems have been installed.

A similar survey was performed in 2005 in Kettering neighborhoods near the former Gentile Air Force Station. Residents of the Wiles Creek neighborhood there complained about pollution from the former Defense Electronics Supply Center. The survey found no abnormalities.

Case acknowledged that a cancer survey could have some limitations.

"We don't know how long the vapors have been in people's homes," he said.

The exact chronology of Behr plant pollution is unclear. Former plant owner Chrysler has said it discovered TCE, or trichloroethylene, contamination in 1996, but it wasn't until Ohio EPA tests in 2006 that hazards to homes were suspected.

Cancer can develop over decades and take the form of many different types of tumors, Case said. In its Ninth Report on Carcinogens, the federal National Toxicology Program determined that TCE is "reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen." The International Agency for Research on Cancer has determined that TCE is "probably carcinogenic to humans," according to the Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry.

In a related development, a community outreach survey sponsored by the Environmental Sustainability Research Group at the University of Dayton will examine health problems in the area. A public meeting on the survey could occur in April, a spokeswoman said.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Behr site proposed as Superfund site, Cancer incidence inquiry planned (OH)
  2. Vapor intrusion in Dayton from Behr Dayton Thermal Products plant (OH)

Friday, February 22, 2008

Cancer prevention and the Presidential Candidates
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, February 22, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Cancer Monthly posted a great feature entitled Cancer and the Presidential Candidates. We extracted the legislative efforts that we think most relevant for TCE-impacted individuals and communities:
Barak Obama has sponsored a bill to enable states to develop or expand activities to monitor exposure to environmental toxins and pollutants (S.1068);

Hilary Clinton has sponsored a bill that would amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to protect the health of susceptible populations from trichloroethylene (S.1911);

Both of them, along with John McCain, cosponsored a bill that would provide grants to better understand the environmental factors related to breast cancer (S.579).
Of course, this is just a glimpse of the candidates' cancer-fighting credentials and only part of the feature. The rest of it is worth checking out, especially the part that leads Cancer Monthly to conclude:
And finally, beneath its public relations veneer as our protector, the FDA is an agency that reportedly lets drug company representatives make decisions for the country, approves dangerous drugs, and does not perform necessary follow-up on approved drugs.
Update: You know, we checked out the proposals that we blindly copied cited above. Of course we were already familiar with the TCE Reduction Act (S.1911), so we checked out the Obama and McCain-sponsored proposals. The McCain cosponsored proposal, (S.579), reads pretty much as Cancer Monthly advertises.

We're not certain, however, that Cancer Monthly captured the full impact of Obama's proposal. It seems to us that its scope is much broader than just expanding states monitoring capabilities. Seems to us like Obama is seeking accountability. Judge for yourself - here's the full text:
'A bill to promote healthy communities. '
Bill # S.1068

Original Sponsor:
Barack Obama (D-IL)

Healthy Communities Act of 2007 - Requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish the Advisory Committee on Environmental Health to review environmental health data and studies to: (1) assess the impact of federal laws, policies, and practices on environmental health and justice; and (2) identify and recommend ways to change or ensure compliance with federal laws, address gaps in federal environmental health research, and prevent or mitigate harm from federal policies, programs, and practices that may adversely affect environmental health or justice. Requires the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to prepare a biennial Environmental Health Report Card for the nation and for each state. Requires the Secretary to: (1) establish the Health Action Zone Program to award grants to at-risk communities for comprehensive environmental health improvement activities; and (2) expand and intensify environmental health research. Requires the Secretary, acting through the Director, to provide grants and technical assistance to enable states to develop or expand activities related to biomonitoring of exposure to environmental toxicants and pollutants. Requires the Secretary to: (1) promote translation and dissemination of findings; and (2) incorporate the data collected under this Act with existing data collection efforts. Requires the Director to expand training and educational activities relating to environmental health and justice for health professionals and public health practitioners.

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

TCE-exposed fathers pass genetic damage to kids, grandkids
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, February 20, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
This news is not good:
ScienceDaily (Feb. 21, 2008) — The consequence of maternal exposure to a variety of potentially toxic agents during pregnancy remains the prime focus of concern in scientific endeavors and in society at large.

However, there is now mounting evidence that paternal exposure can also adversely affect fetal and postnatal development of offspring and that this imprint can be expressed in subsequent generations.

[...]

The reported impact on offspring outcome includes low birth weight; increase in childhood cancers; developmental, behavioral, endocrine abnormalities and cross-generational effects.
We already know that TCE-exposure, even at low levels, can cause permanent genetic damage. The notion that this damage is passed along by TCE-exposed fathers to subsequent generations has staggering public health implications for millions of Americans.

To be fair, we should mention this news came in the form of a symposium announcement rather than as a breaking investigative story. The symposium is being organized by Gladys Friedler, Ph.D., of Boston University School of Medicine and is entitled The Father and Fetus Revisited. You can read more about it here.

Monday, January 28, 2008

Modine settles in McCullom Lake cancer lawsuits (IL)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, January 28, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The Northwest Herald (McHenry County, IL) reports:
Modine Manufacturing tentatively has settled out of court in the McCullom Lake brain-cancer cases, agreeing to pay an undisclosed sum to the 22 plaintiffs and $2 million to settle a class-action lawsuit.

If approved by a U.S. District Court judge, the settlement announced Friday would end Modine’s financial liability in the lawsuits, which tied pollution from its Ringwood manufacturing plant to brain-, nerve- and pituitary-cancer victims. That would leave Rohm and Haas, which operates a plant just north of Modine’s, and subsidiary Morton International as the only remaining defendants.

Modine does not, in any way, admit liability with the settlement, said James Rulseh, vice president of the company’s American operations. The lawsuits alleged that Modine contaminated groundwater and air with trichloroethylene, a chemical used as an industrial-strength degreaser, which in turn broke down into carcinogenic vinyl chloride.

[...]

The class-action lawsuit and the first three individual lawsuits were filed in April 2006. Three former McCullom Lake next-door neighbors, about a mile to the south of the factories, were diagnosed with brain cancer within eight months of one another.

Of the $2 million class-action settlement, Modine will pay $1.4 million toward a medical monitoring program to reimburse current or former village residents who want an MRI. Another $100,000 will establish a fund to reimburse property owners seeking property value relief, and the remaining $500,000 will pay for court-approved attorney’s fees and settlement costs.

Payments to the 22 individual plaintiffs will remain confidential under the settlement, attorney Aaron Freiwald said. The damage cases were filed in state court in Philadelphia, home to Freiwald’s law office and Rohm and Haas’ world headquarters.

Of the plaintiffs, 18 have brain or nerve cancer, three have pituitary cancer, and one has cirrhosis of the liver of unknown origin. Eight of the plaintiffs have died, all but one from glioblastoma multiforme, a deadly brain cancer that occurs in just more than 3 people per 100,000.

[...]

Freiwald said Friday that the settlement allowed him to focus all of his scrutiny on Rohm and Haas, which he said by far was the major contributor to contamination. The factory, owned at the time by Morton, dumped wastes into an 8-acre landfill/lagoon between 1960 and 1977. Rohm and Haas assumed control of the factory in 2005, six years after acquiring Morton for $5 billion.

[...]

The medical-monitoring class includes anyone who lived in village limits for at least one cumulative year between Jan. 1, 1968, and Dec. 31, 2002. The property damage class includes anyone who owned property in the village between April 25, 2006 – the date the class-action lawsuit was filed – and Jan. 18, 2008.
Read the full story here.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Reader Question: Telephone repair and TCE exposure?
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, January 10, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Recently we received the following email/question from a blog reader:
Have there been any reports about workers exposed to TCE and B cell Lymphoma in the Teleco work group?

My job was DCO Repairman - Dial Central Office Repairman - but we used TCE almost every day to clean the electronic and moving parts. So much was used our hands were white from lack of oil, and our shirts always were wet right above the belt line.
Yes, there have been reports of TCE exposure and related disease among telecommunications workers. Amongst others, workers from Lake Mary, FL were exposed to TCE through work at Stromberg-Carlson/Siemens and have experienced health problems (including cancers) as a result. Their website can be found at http://www.exposed2tce.com.

If other readers are looking for information or have a question you'd like answered, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Associated Press articles re: Camp Lejeune and TCE/PCE
by Neil Fischbein on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Rita Beamish from the Associated Press has written three articles that are running in papers around the world today:

Camp Lejeune Water Under Scrutiny
The former residents, who together seek nearly $4 billion, believe their families were afflicted by water containing industrial solvents before the Marines shut off the bad wells in the mid-1980s.

Dates Important in Water Contamination
Key events in the contamination of drinking water at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina.

Solvents in Water Present Perils
Industrial solvents known as TCE and PCE are known health hazards, but the amount of exposure that can cause harm is subject to debate.

Update (June 13):

Congress investigates tainted water at Marine base by Kimberly Hefling
The government Tuesday disclosed results from a new study the same day lawmakers listened to emotional testimony from families about cancers and other illnesses they blame on tainted tap water at the sprawling base.

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Trichloroethylene Cancer Epidemiology: A Consideration of Select Issues
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, May 10, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
This article was made available online yesterday by Environmental Health Perspectives. From the abstract [PDF]:
Trichloroethylene Monograph
Trichloroethylene Cancer Epidemiology: A Consideration of Select Issues
Cheryl Siegel Scott and Weihsueh A. Chiu

A large body of epidemiologic evidence exists for exploring causal associations between cancer and trichloroethylene (TCE) exposure. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s 2001 draft TCE health risk assessment concluded that epidemiologic studies, on the whole, support associations between TCE exposure and excess risk of kidney cancer, liver cancer, and lymphomas, and, to a lesser extent, cervical cancer and prostate cancer. As part of a minimonograph on key issues in the health risk assessment of TCE, this article reviews recently published scientific literature examining cancer and TCE exposure and identifies four issues that are key to interpreting the larger body of epidemiologic evidence: (1) relative sensitivity of cancer incidence and mortality data; (2) different classifications of lymphomas, including non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; (3) differences in data and methods for assigning TCE exposure status; and (4) different methods employed for causal inferences, including statistical or meta-analysis approaches. The recent epidemiologic studies substantially expand the epidemiologic database, with seven new studies available on kidney cancer and somewhat fewer studies available that examine possible associations at other sites. Overall, recently published studies appear to provide further support for the kidney, liver, and lymphatic systems as targets of TCE toxicity, suggesting, as do previous studies, modestly elevated (typically 1.5 to 2.0) site-specific relative risks, given exposure conditions in these studies. However, there are a number of challenging issues that need to be considered before drawing causal conclusions about TCE exposure and cancer from these data.
Download the full version here [PDF]

Monday, February 21, 2005

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) on TCE
by NTF on Monday, February 21, 2005 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies Trichloroethylene (TCE) as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A). Here's a direct link to IARC's summary and evaluation (Updated 1997).



Update: The direct link above is no longer active. Try here.

Saturday, February 19, 2005

ATSDR's ToxFAQs for TCE
by NTF on Saturday, February 19, 2005 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Direct link here. Also added as permanent link in the right column under Science/Agency sites (------>)

Update:

ATSDR's full Toxicological profile of TCE (1997) is here.

Public Health Assessment: Cheshire, CT
by NTF on Saturday, February 19, 2005 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
In the spirit of sharing and for research purposes, we'd like to make available any Public Health Assessments (PHA's) that have been drafted or completed and involve TCE (or related issues).

First up is the 2005 Final Public Health Assessment for Cheshire, CT (the self-proclaimed Bedding Plant Capital of CT) conducted by the ATSDR and the CT Department of Public Health. History of this PHA can be found at the Cancer in Cheshire website* (also a permanent member of our Community site links over to the right (---->). Findings include:
- The town's public water supply (serving just over 20,000 pople) suffered from 16-30 years of ongoing TCE contamination;
- TCE contamination found in the town's private water supply over past 20 yrs. No add'l sampling ordered. Past and current health risk unknown;
- Known contamination sites, discovered over 20 yrs ago, may still be contaminated;
- Cancer rates (multiple types) elevated with statistical significance and some with rising trends;
- Official conclusion: Past exposure to TCE in the public water supply presented No Apparent Public Health Hazard;
- No follow-up recommended.
You can download the full PHA here (FYI: This is an 8 MB pdf document).

If you have any PHA's that you would like to share, please contact us directly.

--

*Disclosure: I am a co-founder of the cancer in cheshire website and was petitioner of the ATSDR (which prompted the assessment above).

Friday, February 18, 2005

National Exposure Registry documents health effects from TCE exposure
by NTF on Friday, February 18, 2005 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Since approximately 1993, the ATSDR has been tracking the health effects reported by discreet communities exposed to Trichloroethylene. Their National Exposure Registry (NER) basically tracks this kind of data for well-identified communities who have been exposed to it (there are myriad qualification requirements, I'm simplifying here).

The NER for TCE has some interesting data and discussion. It raises questions about elevated cancer findings among the TCE-exposed population. Unfortunately, the detailed comparison of cancer types by age/sex for the exposed population vs. the general population never actually appears in the reports (despite references to appendices with this data in 3 separate reporting years: 1994, 1996, and 1999). Maybe I just can't find it. To be sure, in May of 2004, I wrote the ATSDR to request the missing data/appendices. I received this response:
Mr. Fischbein:

The TCE Subregistry cancer outcomes analyses are slated to be released under a separate study. The results are not publically available at this time. Please do keep tabs on our publications for future releases.
I confess, I'm not sure what to make of this. If anybody has any thoughts, please let me know or feel free to use the comments feature below.

Panel considers Camp Lejeune contamination study (NC)
by NTF on Friday, February 18, 2005 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The Jacksonville Daily News reports that a panel of seven scientists met yesterday (Thurs) and will meet again today to discuss the potential for further study of Camp Lejeune contamination and its link to adverse health effects.

According to the report:
Some of the areas considered as focuses for further study include adult cancers and mortality, heart defects, frequency of hospital visits, neurological affects and autoimmune diseases [...and...] a variety of conditions in children who were in the womb during the contaminated years, including neural tube defects, oral clefs, childhood leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and a variety of heart defects. The independent panel was formed to further investigate the contamination of Camp Lejeune's water systems between 1968 and 1985 by the chemicals trichloroethylene (TCE) and tetrachloroethlyene (PCE), cleaning chemicals that leaked from a dry cleaning business on Lejeune Boulevard and into the drinking water for the Tarawa Terrace residential area and other areas of the base.
Panel members included Richard Maas, from the University of North Carolina at Asheville, and Dr. David Ozonoff, from the Boston University School of Public Health. Ozonoff, who has expressed concern over the EPA's handling of the TCE issue, shared this advice:
Ozonoff said he was especially worried about the [ATSDR's] inability to resolve the complaints of many people who were never notified of the contamination or who felt neglected by not being included in the [previous] study. "Let's face it, underlying this is an issue of trust," Ozonoff said. "While ATSDR has a long record of saying they help the community, there is a rocky history. You're going to have to figure out the trust issue."
Full article here. You can also find more information from the community group that has organized at Camp Lejeuene, THE STAND (Toxic Homefront Empowered Survivors Take All Necessary Defense).

Update: Not surprisingly, the Solvents Industry doesn't think further study is warranted. So much so, they issued this press release (warning: links directly to PDF doc)


Thursday, February 17, 2005

National Toxicology Program's evaluation of TCE
by NTF on Thursday, February 17, 2005 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
In the U.S. National Toxicology Program's 11th Report on Carcinogens, TCE is reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen.

Here's a pdf of the TCE review only. Thanks to VJ for link.

Science Advisory Board (SAB) review of 2001 draft health assessment
by NTF on Thursday, February 17, 2005 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
In 2002, the EPA's Science Advisory Board (SAB) reviewed the EPA's 2001 draft health assessment of TCE. The SAB "commends the [EPA] for its groundbreaking work [...] in several important new areas of risk assessment" while also providing suggestions "to strengthen and provide confidence in the assessment."

Here is the full SAB review. Thanks to reader VJ for the link.

EPA's 2001 TCE Health Risk Assessment (External Review Draft)
by NTF on Thursday, February 17, 2005 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Here's a direct link to the EPA's 2001 Document: Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment: Synthesis and Characterization (external review draft)

From the EPA's abstract:
This assessment presents EPA's most current evaluation of the potential health risks from exposure to trichloroethylene (TCE). TCE exposure is associated with several adverse health effects, including neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, developmental toxicity, liver toxicity, kidney toxicity, endocrine effects, and several forms of cancer. Mechanistic research indicates that TCE-induced carcinogenesis is complex, involving multiple carcinogenic metabolites acting through multiple modes of action. Under EPA's proposed (1996, 1999) cancer guidelines, TCE can be characterized as "highly likely to produce cancer in humans."

Update:

I'm trying to find the published responses to this document. I know the Halogenated Solvents Industry (along with several others, if I recall correctly) filed a rather lengthy response. If anyone knows where I can find these, please email me.

To read earlier posts in this category (if there are any), please see our archives below: