The TCE Blog
Trichloroethylene is everywhere. It causes cancer and other serious health problems. People deserve better protection.

HOME ABOUT ARCHIVES CONTACT

Monday, March 31, 2008

Bill Smith, male breast cancer survivor, Camp Lejeune (FL, NC)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, March 31, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Like Mike Partain, Bill Smith is a male breast cancer survivor who was exposed to toxins at Camp Lejeune, NC. Bill was kind enough to share his story with us:
After graduating from Florida State University with a journalism degree, William J. P. Smith, Jr. served in the USMC from 1956 until 1959, stationed at Camp Lejeune, NC, the majority of the time with the Globe as sports editor and acting editor of the largest Corps newspaper at the time. While there, he married, residing at the trailer park on the base and later in Midway Park, while fathering two girls.

In 1994, Bill was diagnosed with breast cancer, and had a radical modified mastectomy with 30 lymph nodes removed from his left side. He was treated with Tamoxifin for five years, and has had no reoccurance. It should be noted that there was no history of any kind of cancer in the Smith family. His former wife and two girls have had no symptoms of the disease.

On behalf of women, Bill has been a fund raiser and is the subject of two books, Living with Breast Cancer, the Story of 39 Women and One Man by Perry Colemore and Lisa Adelsberger, and Messages from Somewhere, Inspiring Stories of Life After 60 by Harriet May Savitz. He has also written an autobiographical screenplay on his experience. The irony of all of this is that Bill was part of the team at Xerox Corporation that introduced xeroradiography for the early detection of breast cancer in 1969 at Hutzel Hospital in Detroit. Every once in a while, he takes the press kit from his library shelf and shares it with his students, who find it hard to believe that men can contract the horrific disease.

Today, Bill resides in Tallahassee, FL with his wife Kathy, teaches at FSU and runs an integrated marketing communications consultancy, Huckleberry Finn Tomorrow.
There are now at least 4 men known to have developed breast cancer after exposure to toxins at Camp Lejeune. With fewer than 2,000 new cases of male breast cancer diagnosed each year, we wonder:
  • What are the odds of finding 4 cases of male breast cancer from the same contaminated military base?
  • How many other military men have developed breast cancer?
As we learn more, we'll keep you posted.

State admits Tallevast pollution study way off mark (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, March 31, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Last week's Sarasota Herald-Tribune (FL) reports:
During the last 20 years, Tallevast residents say dozens of their neighbors have died prematurely. Others are still fighting cancer and beryllium-related health issues.

But a draft Florida Department of Health report on the community blighted by more than 200 acres of polluted ground water found just four cases of cancer.

The report could hardly be more different from a survey by residents that showed about 90 cases of cancer or beryllium-related diseases in the mainly black community.

DOH officials who met with the neighborhood group FOCUS on Monday agreed that their numbers, based on a state database and figures from a local hospital, were wildly off the mark. They also admitted they had studied the wrong ZIP code.


Poisoned at Camp LeJeune, snookered by Uncle Sam
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, March 31, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Mike Partain is a breast cancer survivor. He was diagnosed years after his exposure to toxins at Camp Lejeune, NC. Tallahassee.com tells his story:
Poisoned at Camp LeJeune, snookered by Uncle Sam

Bill Berlow
Associate Editor

Mike Partain, son and grandson of Marine Corps veterans, grew up steeped in traditional American values — a rock-solid Reagan Republican whose life, even before birth, began among the few, the proud, at Camp LeJeune, N.C.

But for the past year, the 40-year-old Tallahassee insurance claims adjuster's faith in his government has been shaken to its core.

He'd always assumed that Uncle Sam, first and foremost, had the health and welfare of U.S. citizens at the top of his priority list — especially if they'd worn the uniform.

Now he's much less sure.

Partain's crisis of doubt began a year ago, when his wife gave him "a hug that changed my life." She found a lump, which turned out to be a cancerous tumor. A 14-inch surgical scar where Partain's right breast used to be is the physical evidence of his breast cancer.

Less obvious is the psychological scar — both as a cancer survivor still undergoing treatment and as one who feels his government betrayed a trust.


Tuesday, March 25, 2008

EPA: Pompano dry cleaner polluted soil, groundwater (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Tuesday, March 25, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The South Florida Sun-Sentinel reports:
A dry-cleaning shop on busy U.S. 1 has been proposed as a federal Superfund site after tests found nearby soil and groundwater contaminated with hazardous chemicals.

An Environmental Protection Agency official said the site presents no immediate health risk, but Broward County's pollution prevention chief said he isn't so sure.

Flash Cleaners, at 4131 N. Federal Highway [map], polluted the ground with a variety of chemicals used in the dry-cleaning business, most likely through spills and disposal of waste through a septic system, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Tests of soil and groundwater found concentrations of several chemicals exceeding federal safety standards, including dichloroethene, trichloroethene, tetrachloroethylene and vinyl chloride.

Although the shop still takes in dry cleaning, it no longer processes it on site.

Barbara Schuster, project manager for the EPA, said there's no immediate danger to public health. Eight drinking-water wells, serving Hillsboro Beach and other portions of northern Broward County, are within a mile of the site. But Schuster said there is little danger to the wells because they lie northwest or southwest of the site and the groundwater flows east, away from the wells.

Jeff Halsey, Broward County's director of pollution prevention and remediation, said there is not enough information to determine how much danger is posed by the underground spread of hazardous chemicals. Among the possible health effects of these chemicals are liver and kidney damage, neurological diseases and cancer, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

"Until we can get an assessment done and know exactly where the plume is going, we're going to be very, very concerned," he said.


Friday, June 29, 2007

News Round-up
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, June 29, 2007 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Each of these stories deserves its own post and and, almost certainly, some commentary. Until we get more time for this, please be sure to check them out directly via the links below. All of them come courtesy of the Google. (Sorry to do it this way, we'll try to get the full versions up soon. That reminds us, we're still looking for local correspondents).

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Long road ahead for 'tainted' Tallevast (with pretty pictures) (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Tuesday, June 12, 2007 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The Sarasota Herald Tribune (FL) posted this excellent graphic of the Tallevast clean-up (includes map, geohydrological layers, explanation of pump and treat, and more). Unfortunately, the accompanying news is less excellent:
Cleaning up the majority of the polluted ground water in Tallevast could take 30 years, and getting it all could take a century, Lockheed Martin officials say. But some experts fear that the Tallevast pollution will never be cleaned up completely.
Read more.

Friday, October 6, 2006

Lockheed done looking for Tallevast plume boundaries (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, October 6, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Last week, The Bradenton Herald (FL) reported:
The investigation of the Tallevast toxic waste plume is over, state environmental regulators announced Monday. Lockheed Martin Corp., the state decided, has adequately defined the plume.

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection has approved Lockheed Martin Corp.'s latest plume maps as final despite objections raised by independent reviews of the defense giant's data.

The approval was good news for Lockheed scientists who have been trying to define the plume to state requirements for the past six years.

[...]

Those impacted by DEP's decision - Tallevast residents and businesses - have 21 days to appeal the DEP decision with the Department's Office of General Counsel in Tallahassee. Failure to file an appeal within the 21-day period would constitute a waiver of any right to an administrative hearing, the approval letter said.

The clock started ticking, DEP said, with the receipt of the letter from William Kutash, professional geologist administrator for DEP's Southwest District.

Copies of Kutash's letter addressed to Tina Armstrong, Lockheed's program manager for the Tallevast site, were sent via e-mail Monday to leaders of FOCUS - Family Oriented Community United Strong -a resident advocacy group in Tallevast.

[...]

Independent experts, some county officials and Tallevast residents united under FOCUS have consistently questioned Lockheed's data on the plume.

Those questions over the past two years- including a review by Wilma Subra, an environmental advocate and chemist who studied Lockheed's data for the Herald - pushed the DEP to require Lockheed to do additional testing that led to the current estimate of the plume's size at 200 acres.

Originally Lockheed maintained that the plume covered just 50 acres and was confined to the plant site.

[...]

Washington said FOCUS would send the letter to the legal team representing more than 300 Tallevast residents and former residents in a lawsuit against Lockheed and others that claims damage from the plume.

[...]

Lockheed has maintained from the beginning that the plume poses no health risk to residents and will have minimal if any impact on property values.
Read the full story here.

For extensive coverage of the ongoing situation in Tallevast, be sure to see The Bradenton Herald's library of ongoing coverage.

Also visit HelpTallevast.com.

Sunday, September 24, 2006

TCE manufacturers sued by polluter; Claim: "They told us to dump it in the ground" (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Sunday, September 24, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Back from a longer than expected break and lots to catch up on. We'll start here:

Yesterday's Orlando Sentinel (FL) reports that Dow Chemical and 18 other manufacturers have been sued by the operator of a Lake Mary, Florida plant around which TCE has been discovered at dangerous levels in soil/groundwater:
MONI Holdings LLC alleges the companies that sold the solvents — not the ones that bought and used them — are responsible for the pollution.

It says solvent manufacturers told customers to discard the chemical — trichloroethene, or TCE — by spreading it on the ground and allowing it to evaporate, according to the suit.

The results, according to the suit, were disastrous.

[...]

"MONI is wholly without fault for the contamination of the groundwater with TCE . . .," according to the suit.
Wholly without fault?!? Is this the "they made us do it" defense? If so, this is finger-pointing the likes of which we've never quite seen from an accused polluter. But it sure is interesting.

You may recall that back in June, Dow lost a major verdict in Modesto, CA where they were found guilty of failing to warn dry cleaners about the dangers of PCE and forced to compensate the city for its cost of installing water filters. The Lake Mary suit seems based on a very similar pattern of alleged behavior. However, the recent Lake Mary suit takes things one step further. Not only does it say the manufacturers failed to warn their customers, it appears the manufacturers may have encouraged the pollution.

Before we draw hasty conclusions about who did what, at minimum this article and the lawsuit raise a number of questions:
  • Did Dow and others tell customers to dump TCE in the ground? If so, did they do so in writing?
  • Is MONI conceding that they did, indeed, dump TCE in the ground?
  • Since litigation is pending over TCE-induced diseases resulting from the Lake Mary plant, could manufacturers be held liable for causing these diseases?
  • Could manufacturers be held liable for TCE-induced disease caused by other contaminated sites across the country?
  • Could manufacturers also be held liable for nation-wide clean-up costs?
As we learn more, we'll be sure to keep you posted. Meantime, you can read the full story about the recent lawsuit here.

Wednesday, August 9, 2006

Announcing the launch of HelpTallevast.com (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Late last week, Family Oriented Community United Strong (FOCUS), the community group advocating for the people in Tallevast, FL, launched a website. From the main page of HelpTallevast.com:
The people of Tallevast are in serious trouble. For the past three years, the members of this small community in Florida have been fighting for their lives against Lockheed Martin Corp. - one of the world's largest defense contractors. In 2000, the company discovered that a faulty sump at a former beryllium plant had leaked toxins, contaminating the community's water and soil. While Lockheed has agreed to clean up the mess, they refuse to move the residents out of the area, leaving them to fend for themselves. For years residents have been struggling to uncover the truth about the damage to their community - to protect their health, and the health of their children.

[...]

The residents of Tallevast need to be moved. Not only has it taken a toll on their health and emotional wellbeing, but the contamination has significantly decreased their property value leaving them stranded. Since these people cannot afford to move themselves out of harms way, there needs to be an intervention. According to the Bradenton Herald, Manatee County has agreed to facilitate a buyout of the Tallevast property owners if Lockheed Martin Corp. is willing to help relocate residents. Lockheed has refused. So now it is up to us to show them that this is not acceptable. Please go the the Take Action section and help the people of Tallevast.
The website contains section for history, Q&A, environmental reports, news, and, as indicated above, a page where you can help take action (they have contact information for local, state and federal officials as well as pre-written letters that you can copy/paste and customize). They've also graciously added our link on their site for folks who want to learn more about TCE.

To anybody reaching us via HelpTallevast.com, welcome. Please let us know if there is any way we can be of assistance.

Monday, July 10, 2006

Yet another review finds Lockheed wrong on Tallevast (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, July 10, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Last week's Bradenton Herald (FL) reported:
A third review found Lockheed Martin Corp.'s latest assessment of the Tallevast plume failed to fully describe the extent of the contamination as the defense giant claimed.

Moreover, Lockheed was premature in its conclusion that risk of human exposure to the contamination is not a concern, said Michael Graves, a geologist and principal consultant for Environmental Sciences and Technologies (EST) of Lakeland.

[...]

"We now have three reviews of Lockheed's data that all reach the conclusion that there is still critical work to be done," said Wanda Washington, vice president of FOCUS. "How much more time will it take? Lockheed has been at it for so long. Time is important. Our lives are at stake. The dangers don't go on hold because of Lockheed's timing."

Graves' criticism echoed two other reviews of the Sara III report - a review by Tim Varney, the independent consultant advising Tallevast residents, and a review by environmentalist and chemist Wilma Subra, who analyzed the data for The Herald.

[...]

Ed Cottingham, lead attorney for more than 300 Tallevast residents who have filed a lawsuit against Lockheed, said he had not had a chance to study Graves' report.

[...]

Washington hopes DEP and Lockheed will hold public meetings to address the SARA III report.

She also hopes people take notice of the three reviews of Lockheed's data.

"How much more will it take for someone to step forward and say, 'Hey, these people are in trouble,' " Washington said. "The more time passes, the more people could be harmed."
Read the full story here.

Saturday, June 10, 2006

Consultant's report and timeline of events in Tallevast (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Saturday, June 10, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
[Thanks, JM, for this tip]

Wilma Subra is a technical adviser for the Louisiana Environmental Action Network. Subra reviewed environmental reports from Lockheed Martin at the request of the Brandenton Herald (FL).

Recently, the Herald published Subra's resume and key findings from Subra's report. The key findings are below. You can also click here [MS WORD, 69KB] for a detailed timeline of what has transpired in Tallevast.

Key Findings:
1. According to Lockheed Martin Corp., Addendum 3 to the Site Assessment Report contains sufficient information for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to base an approval of the Site Assessment phase. Such an approval by the DEP will allow Lockheed to proceed with the preparation of a Final Remedial Action Plan. However, the latest report lacks key information and in some cases includes inaccurate information. It should not be the basis on which to proceed to a Final Remedial Action Plan phase.

2. DEP must require that the lacking information be generated, the inaccurate information corrected, and a fourth Addendum to the Site Assessment be issued and available for public comment, prior to consideration of allowing Lockheed to move to the Final Remedial Action Plan phase...


Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Tallevast attorneys want records; Lockheed tries to block access (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Last week's Bradenton Herald (FL) reports:
Attorneys representing Tallevast residents have requested documents from Lockheed Martin Corp. covering virtually every aspect of operation and handling of hazardous materials [i.e. TCE] at the former Loral American Co. plant.

In a response filed with the court on Tuesday, Lockheed's attorneys called the discovery demands overly broad, vague and inconsistent with Florida law.

[...]

Tallevast residents have long suspected that the contamination at 1520 Tallevast Road is linked to the American Beryllium plume Lockheed now says covers more than 200 acres. Furthermore, Tallevast residents believe that there may a link between Lockheed and the beryllium plant that predates the defense giant's acquisition of Loral in 1996.

Not true, said a Lockheed spokeswoman Thursday.

[...]

Bruce Denson, of the St. Petersburg law firm of Whittemore Denson and a member of the Tallevast legal team, said the requests for discovery documents are well within Florida law.

"Everything we have asked for we consider to be relevant or will lead to relevant information," Denson said Thursday.
Read the full story here.

Thursday, May 18, 2006

We were wrong: Vapor intrusion dangers have been ruled out (sort of) in Tallevast (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, May 18, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Sorry for the error folks. We were wrong (though still unsure how we missed this). As the Bradenton Herald (FL) reported almost one year ago, toxic vapor intrusion dangers have been ruled out by government experts:
Posted on Mon, Aug. 29, 2005

Tests: Vapor levels too low
Skeptics question the methodology used in the study
DONNA WRIGHT
Herald Staff Writer

TALLEVAST - Contradicting residents' fears that their health is endangered from a 131-acre plume of toxic pollution under their community, state and local health experts report no evidence of poisonous indoor vapors in Tallevast.
Read the full story here. Though this doesn't appear to be the last word on vapor intrusion in Tallevast, we are sorry for our oversight.

Friday, May 5, 2006

Department of Defense more powerful than the EPA
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, May 5, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
In light of the recently revealed financial stakes of further TCE regulation for the world's most powerful polluter and the LA Times series on TCE's politics and community impact, we found the following article, entitled "Pollution Cleanups Pit Pentagon Against Regulators," both interesting and disturbing. From everyone's favorite color newspaper, USA Today, in October 2004:
Across the nation, the Pentagon is taking extraordinary steps to limit the military's accountability for a 50-year legacy of pollution, a USA TODAY investigation finds...

Since 2001, Pentagon officials have stalled cleanups at scores of military sites where contamination from training and manufacturing has fouled soil and water. They've used their political clout to sidetrack new regulations that could force the services to spend hundreds of millions of dollars more to deal with pollution. And they've challenged state and federal regulators' power to make the military obey existing environmental laws...

Four years after President Bush campaigned on a pledge to make the military "comply with environmental laws by which all of us must live," the White House is the Pentagon's chief ally in pushing for relief from such laws.

Within the administration, "it's no secret that the EPA is running into this wall with the Pentagon," says Linda Fisher, who served two years as Bush's deputy EPA administrator — the agency's second-in- command — before returning to private work last year.

"Is the Department of Defense taking (regulatory disputes) to the White House more often? Absolutely," says Fisher, who has held environmental jobs in every Republican administration since Ronald Reagan's. "Is the Department of Defense more powerful than the EPA? Yes."

Defense officials say state and federal environmental agencies have too much power to demand costly and intrusive cleanups on military land. The Pentagon wants to cut its $4 billion a year in environmental costs — less than 1% of defense spending — by gaining more authority over where and how cleanups will be done.

"Some of these regulators are doing wrongheaded things based on poor scientific evidence," says Raymond DuBois, deputy undersecretary of Defense for installations and environment. "Shouldn't we, as stewards of the taxpayers' money, decide how we're going to clean up?"
Ummm. No.

The article goes on to highlight key findings of the USA Today investigation:
•The Pentagon is thwarting environmental agencies' efforts to set cleanup rules.

Since 2001, the armed services have delayed more than 70 federal cleanup agreements that would dictate the scope and timing of restoration at contaminated military sites...

The Pentagon also is fighting EPA efforts to set new pollution limits on two military contaminants: perchlorate, a munitions ingredient, and trichloroethylene (TCE), a solvent. After military officials complained to the White House that the EPA's studies overstated the chemicals' health risks, the agency opted to wait for years of additional study before making new rules.

State environmental regulators are facing military resistance, too. In Colorado, California, Ohio and Minnesota, the services are fighting state efforts to restrict the future use of contaminated military property. In California, Florida, Hawaii and Alaska, the military has challenged the authority of state officials to fine the armed forces for pollution problems.

•The EPA is cutting efforts to make the military comply with environmental laws.

•The Pentagon is spending less on cleanups.
If you check out the full article, you can read more about places like Lowry Air Force Base where AF appears to be deciding for itself whether toxic clean-up is really necessary. Or you can check out USA Today's nifty Flash presentation in which you can view the clean-up status of 130 military-owned Superfund sites in 39 states, state by state (OK, we cheated, you can launch it from here. <--- warning, must have flash installed to view).

note: If any readers have a ton of time on their hands, here's a project idea. We'd like to post a list of these 130 military EPA Superfund sites, by state. We'll make it a point to extract all the names and descriptions from the USA Today preso and will post it here when it's complete. It may be some time before we get to this. If anyone wants to get a jump on it in the meantime, we promise we will not complain. We might even be willing to publicly thank you for your effort. If you've got any interest in this project, please let us know.

Monday, May 1, 2006

Map of 200-acre Tallevast plume (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, May 1, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The Bradenton Herald (FL) has posted a link to this plume map of the Tallevast contamination (click image to enlarge, or here to download as PDF for better detail):
Through the magic of Google and Photoshop, we have overlayed street labels so you can get a better sense of the location (click image to enlarge):

Tallevast plume still growing; locals lack trust in Lockheed + data (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, May 1, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Last week, a Lockheed Martin report indicated that the size of the growing plume in Tallevast now covers up to 200 acres, having grown to 8 times the original estimated size of 25 acres since a year ago. It seems each time a new Lockheed report is submitted, this plume has grown in size. Nevertheless, Lockheed doesn't miss the chance for their own positive spin:
"It's not a growing plume," Lockheed spokeswoman Gail Rymer said. "It's that, as we were able to install more monitoring wells, we were better able to delineate the plume. We feel confident that we've reached the edge of the plume."
It appears others are not so confident:
Representatives from Family Oriented Community United Strong, or FOCUS, a residents' advocacy group, say they've heard before that the edge of the plume had been defined but then subsequent reports from Lockheed to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection showed a larger area.

"It was no surprise that (the plume) has grown," said Wanda Washington, vice president of FOCUS. "If Lockheed says it's grown to 200 acres, I'd be willing to believe that it's grown to 300 or more."

...

Washington said FOCUS wants Lockheed to fund another study, this time by a FOCUS-hired geologist.

"We'll be satisfied when our guy tells us he thinks he's found the end of it," Washington said of the plume. "We're not trying to make a bad situation worse, we're just looking for the truth. We don't have the trust in Lockheed or their data."
Read the latest updates from The Bradenton Herald (FL) here and here.

Sunday, April 16, 2006

Is the Tallevast community breathing toxic TCE vapors?? (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Sunday, April 16, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
We don't suggest the possiblity lightly, but we wondered it aloud nearly a year ago when we failed to find reports of vapor intrusion testing in an area that seemed to warrant it. TCE has since been discovered in shallow groundwater as close as 10 ft from the surface within this ever-growing TCE plume that has now* spread over 130 acres underneath a residential community. We know that shallow groundwater contamination by TCE above 5ppb at this depth ought to trigger immediate consideration of vapor intrusion (according to US EPA) but still see no record of any such considerations in Tallevast. Who is responsible for testing indor air in Tallevast and why aren't they doing this now??

In today's Bradenton Herald (FL), an editorial entitled Tallevast might not have borders reminds us that an independent expert has reviewed the data and says the plume is far more dangerous than either Lockheed or government regulators have admitted. We also learn that Manatee county seems to have backed away from plans to protect the contaminated area from risky development after succumbing to outcries of community members opposed to such safety measures. Finally, the editorial ends with this plea:
Everyone in Manatee County should be concerned about the scope and potential impact of the toxic plume under Tallevast and . . .That's the point. We don't know the boundaries or depth yet. And we deserve to know. And remedies must begin immediately.
Indeed. And, we'd add, vapor intrusion must be ruled out quickly, lest whomever would be responsible for leading these tests prefers to knowingly leave this community exposed.

* Nearly 1 yr ago, Lockheed Martin suggested that residents should not be concerned by the then-quadrupling of the known size of the plume. To this day, Lockheed is still trying to find the growing plume's borders.

Sunday, April 9, 2006

Lake Mary workers sue current land owners (not past polluters) over TCE exposure + illness (FL)
by Neil Fischbein on Sunday, April 9, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
A reader forwarded us the following article from today's Orlando Sentinel (FL):
More than three dozen former workers at a defunct telecommunications plant say they were poisoned by contaminated water they unwittingly used for everything from making coffee to washing their hands. The water came from the ground below them, polluted by toxic chemicals used to make phone equipment but then dumped on the property, according to a series of lawsuits. The chemicals worked their way into the drinking-water supply that was pumped back into the building, according to the suits.

The employees became seriously ill, all but a few with cancer. At least four have died during the plant's 35-year history.

So far, 13 workers or their survivors are suing, but they are not suing the suspected polluters. They are trying a different legal tactic, one designed to get money without assigning blame. Their lawyers say that is necessary because several companies operated the plant through the years. One of those companies made them seriously ill, but they don't know precisely which, their lawyers say. "You can't really prove on which day which exposure caused them to get cancer," said Steve Eichenblatt, a lawyer representing the group.

[...]

The now-idle plant, at 400 Rinehart Road, was run by at least five companies or business ventures after General Dynamics Corp. built it for subsidiary Stromberg-Carlson Corp. in 1968 in a former orange grove. Successors include United Technologies Corp., Marconi Communications Inc. and Siemens AG. Siemens operated the plant for more than a decade before closing it in 2003, according to court records, though about 200 employees still work in an office building on the edge of the site. Although the owners changed, the work force of about 2,000 at any given time manufactured the same thing through the years: telephone-network switches.

[...]

Nearly all of the 13 who are suing were diagnosed with cancer, including kidney cancer and leukemia, said Paul Byron, a partner of Overchuck, De Marco, Byron, Overchuck, P.A., one of the Orlando-area law firms representing the employees.
Check out this graphic of the contamination area or read the full story here.

(Thanks, T.S., for the tip.)

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Lake Mary workers sue current land owners (not past polluters) over TCE exposure + illness (FL)
  2. Workers poisoned by toxins, suit says (FL)

Thursday, March 30, 2006

LA Times: TCE, Health, and Community Impact (Part II of II)
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, March 30, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Here's another important piece on TCE From the LA Times (CA) with national scope/importance. This was on Thursday's front page:
Cancer Stalks a 'Toxic Triangle'
Scientists disagree about the risks of TCE. But residents near a former air base are dead certain.
By Ralph Vartabedian
Times Staff Writer

March 30, 2006

SAN ANTONIO — On nearly every block surrounding the former Kelly Air Force Base, small purple crosses sprout from front lawns, marking the homes where cancer has struck.

The residents call their neighborhood the "toxic triangle," alleging that the Air Force poisoned it with an industrial solvent, trichloroethylene, or TCE. It was casually dumped at the base for decades and spread for miles through a shallow aquifer under 22,000 nearby houses.

Texas health authorities have found elevated rates of liver cancer among residents, as well as higher-than-normal rates of birth defects. Though state health officials say it is impossible to prove that TCE causes the sickness here, this blue-collar community has little doubt about the connection.

"We are dying day by day," said Robert Alvarado Sr., who has lived in a small clapboard home for 36 years that sits about 14 feet over the TCE plume. "I have kidney failure, my wife has thyroid cancer, my neighbor just died of breast cancer."